Intro: Not just because my maternal great grandparents came to America from Lviv, but because of the inhumanity of what looks like is about to happen as a result of what a crazed leader is capable of doing, I'm appalled by what Putin is doing and am sickened for what looks like he will do to Ukraine. That said, I truly do not understand what is at stake for the United States, Western Europe, and the world order. Here is my problem:
How to Determine Values: It is relatively easy to determine values, namely, by looking at the penalties for transgressions. For example, if double parking carried the death penalty, while murder carried a $10 fine, it would be clear that, for that jurisdiction, impeding the flow of traffic would be seen as more valuable than human life. In international relations, imposing sanctions on an adversary/enemy says one thing, but facing off with troops says another.
The Ukraine Problem: There is much hyperbole about the implications and ramifications of Putin's invading Ukraine--for Ukraine, for the stability of the other former Soviet republics, for Western Europe, and for the world order. Here's what we know about the stakes in Ukraine: What Putin is about to do is so horrible that severe sanctions are going to be imposed by the U.S. and its allies. But, what Putin is about to do is not so horrible to warrant putting forces into Ukraine to defend it.
The Solutions?: So, what should do we do and why? Put another way, why are the stakes not high enough to defend Ukraine with troops? And, if they are not that high, how does one calibrate the sanctions to be imposed? As the subject line above indicates, I don't have a clue. I just wish the Administration might be a little clearer on the matter in correlating its hyperbole with its conduct.
[EOP]