[Prefatory Note: The Committee has compiled an overwhelming and impressive case, which has irrefutably established the Trump was the central figure in setting the weaponry through the studied promulgation of the Big Lie and then lighting the fuse that became an armed insurrection to overthrow the Constitution and our democracy. Nothing that follows should be taken to detract from that. That said, it is fair to object to what follows as being nitpicking quibbles from a disgruntled viewer who has an unholy obsession with understanding one's audience and the quality and persuasiveness of one's presentation to that audience. But the media and its supporting bloviators who hate Trump might be seen by many as not credible when they breathlessly headline their remarks with the supposed new "blockbuster revelations and evidence"]
1. I might be the only person who watched this latest hearing from beginning to end. I have no doubt, when the TV ratings come in, the number of viewers, if graphed, will be a steep diagonal line starting in the upper left and ending in the lower right of the page.
2. It would be fascinating to hear whom the Committee members think their audience is. It surely is not people who have not made up their minds and whom they are trying to convince. It must be people for whom they wish to give information to confirm what they have thought all along--Trump is a bad dude.
3. The idea that the presentation is made up of teleprompter lectures by each Committee member leads to one conclusion: These politicians care more to be on camera than they care how to make the best presentation. It is undeniable that carving the hearing up so that each Committee member gets to present (read) their case (however duplicative) was the priority of the Committee.
4. At least 95% of what was presented was pure repetition--repeating both what had been presented before and repeating what was again presented at this hearing. As to the supposed new stuff, it actually did not seem to tie-in or close-off anything new.
5. One problem with teleprompters is that the speaker speaks every word which was written out as a speech. As a result, the presentations become filled with irrelevant detail that would not be included if one were doing an actual opening statement or closing argument or just telling a story. The other problem is that where, as often was the case, the teleprompter is off to the side, the Committee member appears to be speaking to someone else but not the TV audience.
6. A story needs some coherence. Often using chronological order is a way to give a story coherence. Here, virtually every Committee member jumped back and forth in time and back and forth in time again again and again, adding to the needless repetition and disjointedness.
7. It's nice that they finally got around to subpoena-ing Trump. I don't know if they ever even asked him to testify. What I do understand is that the subpoena expires at the end of this term of Congress. With Bannon being the only person adjudicated for criminal contempt for not complying with a Committee subpoena, and several remain to be adjudicated, the obvious question is: What took the Committee so long to issue the subpoenas it did. They all could have been issued nearly a year ago.
8. It also is clear that this Committee, much like DOJ, seems to have no sense of time. They say they will issue a report that will detail all that they've found, including additional "big deal" stuff referred to in today's hearing but not presented.
9. Finally, I don't know what to say about the video of the Republicans on January 6 and after condemning Trump and what happened on January 6. What I do know is they didn't vote to convict on impeachment, and they kissed his ass down at Mara-Lago and continue to do so to this day.
[EOP]